Elspeth R. M. Dusinberre. Empire, Authority, and Autonomy in Achaemenid Anatolia
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Adaptation, Autonomy, and Authority
Adaptation is a fact of life. If I walk down the street and fall down a manhole, I’m likely to keep a lookout for open manholes in the future. In this case, I adapt to my circumstances; I take a more cautious approach than I might otherwise have. This is true of all forms of life, and plausibly helps to explain the fact that there is, in fact, life at all. Adaptation of preferences is not much ...
متن کاملposition of eastern states in achaemenid empire
on the one hand, the vacant position of study about impact of achaemenid empire on eastern states is due to silence by classic authors in dealing with these lands; and on the other hand, it is reffered to shortage of archeological artifacts relating to achaemenids at the given region. in the present essay, by the aid of reminiscent works and economic and administrative evidences obtained from e...
متن کاملAutonomy and authority in medical futility
Medical futility has been proposed for many years to define the procedure that simply prolongs the suffering of patients but heals nothing [1] . To deal with the decision procedure for treatment, two ideas arise: patients9 autonomy and doctors9 authority. Widely recognized in 1960s, patients9 autonomy respected patients9 willingness over treatment, requiring specific consent for treatment and r...
متن کاملThe Political Thought of Darius the Great (522- 486 B.C.), the Legislator of Achaemenid Empire (A Study Based on Achaemenid Inscriptions in Old Persian)
Darius offered the political order of “king of kings” to solve the political crisis of his era. He legitimized it based on an order of gods. In his belief, the nature of politics was based on a dualistic religious worldview that is the fight between true divinity and false divinity’s will and performance in the world. In addition, the chief true divinity’s law was introduced as the principle or...
متن کامل. M-autonomy
What we traditionally call ‘conscious thought’ actually is a subpersonal process, and only rarely a form of mental action. The paradigmatic, standard form of conscious thought is non-agentive, because it lacks veto-control and involves an unnoticed loss of epistemic agency and goal-directed causal self-determination at the level of mental content. Conceptually, it must be described as an uninte...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Abstracta Iranica
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0240-8910,1961-960X
DOI: 10.4000/abstractairanica.45526